The Janus Face of the Internet


Many people think about the Internet as a tool of empowerment, giving Mr. Everyman possibilities for expression, business success, participation, and so on.

In some aspects I do agree with this romantic vision. Yes,  anyone can start a business there, anyone can have a say. The power of sharing has made history in cases like Wikileaks, and the power of communities can do things which are otherwise utterly impossible, like Wikipedia. But the Internet is a two-faced beast. When something really takes off in the Internet, the businesses centralise and concentrate faster than any business in the history of capitalism.

Look at the numbers: Facebook has a 57% market amongst social media platforms. Google’s share of the search market is 67% (and online-marketing 33%). Global Internet retail grows about 15% annually, and Amazon owns a quarter of it. 200 billion dollars worth of stuff is traded every year on eBay, and collectibles business has moved there, abandoning physical stores. Radical openness as a business model has created the fastest monopolization. Google launched Android late 2007. In four years it became the dominant mobile operating system. The Android landslide combined with the disruptive Apple ecosystem pushed the former leader Nokia out of the market.

Many of these companies have built their empires in just a couple of years. Of course the nature of the IT business means that a dominant position is never permanent, and the companies need to constantly reinvent themselves to stay at the top. But it’s easier to reinvent yourself if you have tons of cash.

None of the companies dominating the Internet are from Europe. After losing all the momentum in mobile phones, the European digital businesses are mostly dominant only on the national level. One showstopper is a poor understanding of the nature of Internet innovation. I’ve hardly ever seen anything less Internet-like than the Future Internet program of the European Union, driven by big corporations trying to push proprietary software down the throats of SME’s.

The other key challenge is the lack of a single European market place. Europe is especially incompatible in some key areas of future growth, such as service businesses – healthcare, wellbeing, services for the elderly population. Currently it’s impossible to scale services up  in those areas in Europe, because the national systems, legislations and processes are incompatible.

If I could give one task to the European Union, it would be to build a real European digital single market. Drop everything else.

Picture: Brad Reed,

Manchester Rocked

I spent all of last week in the 4th ENoLL Summer School, in the great city of Manchester. Summer school keeps getting better; we had a fabulous time in Helsinki last year, but this year’s event was even more intense and stimulating.

There were too many highlights to be listed here. Some of the key moments, news and touching moments were…

…the research day. The scientific community around Living Labs is growing and showing results.

… the World Bank collaboration meeting. Our Memorandum of Understanding is turning into concrete action plan and joint activities.

…and finally, farewell to Anna Kivilehto, our fantastic network manager. She goes forward in her career as she was headhunted for Laurea Living Labs network. Loss for ENoLL, great news for Laurea. Congratulations Anna, the great news is that you move to Helsinki and I’ll see you more often!

Summer school made a wave; “ENoLL(#ENoLLSS13) has reached more than 77,600 accounts with around 700,000 impressions on Twitter. 111 contributors have been posting more than 420 tweets within 7 days short period.”